7 Finest GRC Software program I Belief in 2025 for Threat Administration


Each time I sit down with my InfoSec group, one factor turns into clear: managing governance, danger, and compliance seems like making an attempt to hit a shifting goal. Rules change, dangers evolve, and regardless of how sturdy the processes are, one thing at all times slips by means of the cracks. If you happen to’re a compliance officer, danger supervisor, audit or perhaps a CIO, precisely what I imply.

I’ve heard tales of groups buried below spreadsheets, scrambling to reply to audits, or losing hours monitoring down the newest coverage updates. That’s in all probability why you’re right here—searching for the greatest GRC software program that may simplify all of that chaos and make your work extra environment friendly.

As somebody who writes extensively about cybersecurity and consults with consultants within the subject, I’ve had a front-row seat to the challenges professionals such as you face. That’s why I’ve accomplished the analysis to establish the 7 greatest governance, danger, and compliance (GRC) software program for 2025. 

On this article, I will cowl all the things it’s essential learn about these GRC instruments—options, professionals, cons, my private assessment, and what different customers must say.

Whether or not you’re making an attempt to streamline audits, acquire higher insights into danger, or guarantee your group stays compliant, this information will aid you discover the correct match to your wants.

7 greatest GRC software program I like to recommend to simplify compliance 

After I take into consideration governance, danger, and compliance (GRC) software program, I see it as a option to deliver construction and readability to the advanced job of managing dangers and compliance.

I’ve had numerous conversations with my safety, IT, and compliance groups, and one factor is evident: GRC actually comes all the way down to having processes in place to mitigate danger. However the correct GRC instruments go a step additional—they make these processes simpler and extra environment friendly.

For instance, automation is a large quality-of-life enchancment in GRC software program. As a substitute of manually monitoring when a regulatory compliance assessment is due, figuring out gaps in danger assessments, or following up on audit duties, an excellent GRC platform does the heavy lifting.

It sends well timed reminders when actions have to be taken, like updating insurance policies, conducting danger analyses and compliance audits, or submitting audit experiences. It’s like having a information that walks you thru each step of a fancy regulatory course of, making certain nothing will get ignored—just like how a software program set up wizard simplifies setup.

GRC software program brings all the things below one roof. It ensures insurance policies are adopted, dangers are managed successfully, and compliance necessities are met—all with out the chaos of spreadsheets or scattered instruments. For my group, it’s not nearly comfort; it supplies a transparent view of challenges and the arrogance to handle them effectively.

How did I discover and consider the most effective GRC platform? 

I began with G2 grid experiences to create a shortlist of top-performing instruments in 2025. Then, I turned to my InfoSec and compliance group to grasp what options matter most to them of their day-to-day workflows.

 

As soon as I had a clearer image, I explored these instruments myself, diving into their capabilities and figuring out what stood out—each the great and the dangerous. So as to add one other layer of perception, I used AI to summarize evaluations from different customers, which gave me a greater understanding of how these instruments carry out in real-world eventualities.

By combining all this analysis, I used to be capable of finding the 5 GRC instruments that ship the most effective stability of performance, ease of use, and worth.

 

One factor to notice is that almost all of those GRC platforms solely provide demos as an alternative of full entry except you decide to a paid plan. Nonetheless, the demos present sufficient performance to actually perceive their worth and the way they may match our wants.

My standards for the most effective GRC software program 

After I evaluated GRC instruments, I didn’t simply take a look at surface-level talents. I took a deep dive into what issues most to InfoSec, compliance, and danger groups, making certain my standards had been detailed and technical sufficient to satisfy their wants. Right here’s what I prioritized:

  • Ease of use with customization choices: In my expertise, regardless of how superior a device is, it received’t ship worth if it’s onerous to make use of. I appeared for GRC instruments that provided intuitive interfaces and minimal studying curves. On the similar time, I wished software program that might adapt to totally different wants, reminiscent of customizable dashboards, workflows, and reporting templates. Flexibility is essential as a result of no two organizations have the very same necessities.
  • Automation that reduces guide workloads: One of many greatest ache factors my compliance and danger groups shared with me is the time wasted on repetitive duties. I paid shut consideration to instruments that automate key processes, reminiscent of compliance monitoring, danger evaluation workflows, proof assortment, and exterior and inside audit job notifications. The flexibility to set triggers and obtain real-time alerts when actions are due stood out as vital characteristic.
  • Threat and compliance framework help: It was essential that the instruments help sturdy danger administration capabilities—issues like real-time danger identification, scoring fashions, danger warmth maps, and dynamic mitigation monitoring. On the compliance aspect, I checked for compatibility with main frameworks like ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and NIST. Instruments that supply automated management mapping, hole evaluation, and the power to cross-reference frameworks had been particularly helpful.
  • Integration with current programs: I didn’t need instruments that function in isolation. For GRC to work effectively, it wants to attach with different programs reminiscent of ERP software program like SAP and Oracle, CRM platforms, safety instruments like CrowdStrike and Splunk, id administration programs, and ticketing platforms like Jira. I appeared for instruments with open APIs and pre-built integrations that allowed easy knowledge sharing throughout platforms.
  • Centralized coverage and incident administration: Insurance policies are the spine of compliance, and I evaluated instruments that supply centralized storage, model management, automated distribution, and acknowledgment monitoring for higher coverage administration. Equally, for incident administration, I prioritized instruments that present real-time incident alerts, detailed root trigger evaluation, and integration with SIEMs for streamlined safety workflows.
  • Superior reporting and visible analytics: My compliance and danger groups usually want actionable insights. I targeted on instruments with highly effective reporting capabilities that permit customers to generate customized experiences, observe KPIs, and visualize knowledge by means of dashboards, warmth maps, and danger traits. Instruments that provided granular filtering and exportable experiences earned further factors in my analysis.
  • Scalability and mobility: As organizations develop, GRC software program must scale with them. I examined how effectively the instruments may deal with growing numbers of customers, advanced workflows, and rising knowledge volumes. Cell accessibility additionally mattered—groups have to handle dangers and compliance on the go, and a device with out responsive design or cell apps felt outdated.
  • Knowledge safety and entry management: Given how a lot delicate data GRC instruments deal with, I used to be notably strict about knowledge safety. I appeared for role-based entry controls, sturdy encryption, and compliance with world safety requirements like SOC 2 and ISO 27001. With out these, a device merely doesn’t go the bar.
  • Audit and vendor danger administration: Audits could be a nightmare with out the correct instruments. I prioritized software program that simplifies audit planning and execution, reminiscent of automated proof requests, audit scheduling, and real-time monitoring. Equally, instruments that help vendor danger assessments, contract monitoring, and dynamic danger scoring for third-party relationships earned larger marks.
  • Assist, documentation, and value effectiveness: Lastly, I wanted instruments that include dependable help, clear documentation, and onboarding help. GRC is advanced, and poor help could be a dealbreaker. On the similar time, I in contrast pricing fashions to make sure the instruments delivered worth for cash, particularly for groups with tight budgets.

After evaluating 15+ GRC instruments, I narrowed my record all the way down to seven. These instruments stand out, providing the functionalities, effectivity, and reliability GRC professionals want.

The record under incorporates real consumer evaluations from enterprise danger administration software program. To be included on this class, an answer should:

  • Catalog, assess, and mitigate business-specific dangers reminiscent of monetary or well being and security.
  • Present instruments to speak dangers to workers, clients, distributors, and suppliers.
  • Create, preserve, and implement company insurance policies and guidelines for inside and exterior use.
  • Keep an up-to-date repository of legal guidelines, rules, and trade requirements.
  • Assist customers plan, implement, and observe the efficiency of audit packages and duties.
  • Guarantee enterprise continuity administration by means of incident administration and danger mitigation.
  • Ship coaching and studying for compliance functions, together with certifications.
  • Carry out third-party, vendor, and provider danger assessments and due diligence.
  • Assist a number of danger administration methodologies, reminiscent of quantitative and qualitative.
  • Collect and analyze environmental, social, and governance (ESG) knowledge from numerous sources.

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations might have been edited for readability.  

1. AuditBoard

AuditBoard is without doubt one of the high GRC instruments available in the market; half of Fortune 500 firms use it. After exploring its options, I get the hype. 

What caught my consideration—and the eye of many professionals I’ve spoken to—is how user-friendly and intuitive the interface is. Whether or not it’s auditors, stakeholders, or compliance groups, the platform appears designed with their wants in thoughts.

I like how effectively AuditBoard brings all the things associated to GRC collectively. It brings all of your risk-related data collectively in a single centralized location, hyperlinks it on to your audit plans, and integrates all the things right into a single, unified platform for administration.

One in all my favourite functionalities of the device is the AuditBoard Enterprise Intelligence or ABI dashboard. They transcend being simply visually interesting—they supply actionable, real-time insights into danger administration, audit trails, and management testing. It’s these options that make navigating the complexities of GRC not simply simpler but in addition extra environment friendly.

One other private favourite of mine is AuditBoard AI, powered by generative AI. It helps with many doc creation duties, reminiscent of organising vendor questionnaires of third-party software program, producing new controls, dangers, and points primarily based on our inputs, or summarising audit experiences

Personally, I’m impressed with AuditBoard’s integration capabilities. The platform integrates effectively with current workflows, connecting with instruments reminiscent of knowledge warehouses, CRM or ERP programs, ticketing platforms, HR software program, and even id administration instruments. This interoperability reduces the necessity for guide knowledge transfers, which, I imagine, will permit groups to work extra cohesively throughout departments.

That stated, no device is ideal, and AuditBoard isn’t any exception. Its customization choices are sturdy. Nonetheless, some customers I spoke with talked about that organising the ABI dashboards will be time-consuming, which is one thing to think about in the event you’re pressed for time or assets.

One other level I got here throughout was that the platform continuously rolls out new updates, which is nice. However in follow, it could actually catch customers off guard. There have been a number of instances when a brand new characteristic was mechanically enabled with out a lot discover, complicated customers or inflicting some modifications to their dashboards. I really feel this might be higher managed with clearer communication.

Total, AuditBoard delivers on its promise to simplify and improve GRC processes. From centralizing danger and audit administration to providing real-time insights and integrations, it’s clear why it’s a go-to selection for a lot of organizations.

What I like about AuditBoard:

  • I actually admire how easy the interface is. It feels prefer it’s designed with professionals like auditors, compliance groups, and danger managers in thoughts, making even advanced duties really feel manageable.
  • The best way it centralizes danger, management, and audit administration into one platform is a large win for me. It eliminates the necessity for juggling a number of instruments and ensures all the things stays related and arranged.

What G2 customers like about AuditBoard: 

“Audit Board provides nearly all the things it’s essential handle the Audit world. The varied fashions permit you to construct the answer and tailor it to your wants. What amazed me essentially the most was the Academy program and the group that helps you earlier than and after your implementation Challenge.

 

After a number of months of use, the entire firm already feels the influence, particularly on the reactiveness in direction of points and Motion Plans! We use the Audit board day by day, each for fieldwork and Audit Administration. After six months within the system, we’re nonetheless Enhancing our course of because of the options of the system and the fixed updates and new functionalities provided.” 

 

AuditBoard Evaluation, Giacomo S, Worldwide Inner Auditor. 

What I dislike about AuditBoard:
  • Establishing dashboards could be a bit time-consuming from my remark. Whereas the customization choices are nice, it’s not the simplest course of in the event you’re coping with a whole lot of complexity.
  • I seen that updates can generally catch customers off guard. When new options are enabled mechanically, it could actually confuse customers, which might be averted with higher communication.
What G2 customers dislike about AuditBoard: 

The permissions matrix is a bit of advanced from an administrator standpoint – have to be sure to spend the time understanding groups versus roles and how one can customise them accordingly. This goes again to taking advantage of your implementation part.

Additionally, there may be nearly at all times a brand new characteristic being launched or enhanced. At instances (like when enhancements simply present up somewhat than needing to be enabled), options can confuse customers or trigger them to make use of features when not desired. This ought to be minimized by having an energetic administrator.”

AuditBoard Evaluation, Kylie G, Senior Auditor and Knowledge Analyst. 

Learn to simplify ISO compliance and preserve your corporation on observe. 

2. Workiva

For me, Workiva really shines in terms of monetary reporting and compliance. As somebody who’s frolicked exploring instruments that simplify compliance and danger administration, there are a number of explanation why I discover Workiva invaluable.

Workiva

Like in AuditBoard, I like that I can pull in knowledge from my normal ledger software program, ESG reporting instruments, HR programs and different instruments straight into the system with a button push. 

However, essentially the most notable performance to me is its means to hyperlink knowledge throughout a number of experiences and paperwork. When engaged on one thing as important as Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) or U.S. Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) filings, even the smallest error in a single part can create inconsistencies elsewhere.

Workiva takes that stress away by mechanically updating linked knowledge in actual time. So, if I replace the quantity in a single file and push to 100 different hyperlinks with a button click on, all the things will get up to date mechanically. This stage of accuracy is a lifesaver when even minor oversights can result in penalties or failed audits.

Collaboration is another excuse I feel Workiva is a must have for GRC professionals. From what I’ve seen, reporting and audit preparation usually contain a number of groups—finance, authorized, IT, and danger administration—and getting everybody on the identical web page could be a nightmare.

With Workiva, everybody can work on the identical doc concurrently with out worrying about model management. I discovered this extremely clear and saves a whole lot of time.

However there are some drawbacks I noticed. One factor I’ve famous is that Workiva can decelerate often, particularly when you’ve a number of tabs open or when there’s a whole lot of knowledge concerned. If you happen to open only one further tab, there’s an opportunity the system would possibly freeze, which will be irritating throughout important moments.

One other concern I’ve noticed is a few limitations in modifying and formatting the paperwork, be it Phrase, presentation, or Excel recordsdata, utilizing Workiva instruments. As an example, paperwork imported from Phrase into Workiva can have some formatting points, reminiscent of misaligned margins and sudden web page breaks. This will make doc modifying extra time-consuming than it ought to be.

That stated, Workiva remains to be probably the greatest GRC software program for bringing collectively all of your monetary and  ESG  reporting into one place. If you happen to’re searching for an answer to streamline your monetary reporting and compliance processes and cut back the stress of managing large-scale reporting, I’d positively suggest giving Workiva a attempt.

What I like about Workiva:

  • I really like how effortlessly Workiva handles knowledge linking throughout paperwork. After I replace a determine in a single place, it mechanically updates in all places else, saving me a lot time and making certain all the things stays correct.
  • Actual-time collaboration is a defining attribute for me. It permits my total group to work on the identical doc concurrently, eliminating model management complications and retaining everybody on the identical web page.

What G2 customers like about Workiva: 

“Workiva has a really intuitive monetary reporting platform. I can simply make formatting modifications and guarantee my doc is SEC-compliant. Workiva additionally permits me to combine knowledge from numerous sources, automating knowledge linking throughout experiences, and bettering accuracy.

Workiva additionally permits a number of customers to work concurrently on paperwork, making certain real-time updates and lowering model management points. I can simply observe my work by means of simply generated redlines.

Workiva additionally supplies nice buyer help. For any doc or submitting concern, I can attain a Workiva specialist inside minutes.”

Workiva Evaluation, Bo G, Director of SEC Reporting and Accounting. 

What I dislike about Workiva:
  • I’ve noticed that the system can decelerate, particularly when you’ve a number of tabs open or when working with massive quantities of information. Typically, it even freezes, which will be annoying throughout tight deadlines.
  • One other factor that bothers me is the modifying and formatting limitations, which frequently require further time to regulate paperwork correctly. Whereas not a serious concern, it may be annoying and time-consuming
What G2 customers dislike about Workiva:

I really feel like generally my mind goes sooner than how lengthy it takes to change between a Workiva doc and a Workiva spreadsheet. Typically, once I copy a supply hyperlink and paste it into the Workiva doc, it takes some time, and when I’ve quite a few issues to repeat, it simply finally ends up messing with my velocity.” 

Workiva Evaluation,  Daisy Y, Small Enterprise. 

3. Scrut Automation

Scrut Automation is a kind of platforms that instantly stands out for its means to simplify compliance with out making the method really feel like a endless guidelines to me.

Scrut automation

I’ve explored a whole lot of GRC instruments, and what makes Scrut totally different is how effectively it balances automation with usability. In contrast to some enterprise-heavy platforms that require months of onboarding, However from what I see, Scrut makes coverage administration, danger monitoring, and compliance audits really feel much less like a burden and extra like a structured, manageable course of.

One of many first issues I spotted is how efficient Scrut is at serving to organizations preserve a number of compliance frameworks. Whether or not it’s ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOC 2, or cyber danger administration, Scrut centralizes all the things in a single place, making it simpler to navigate these overlapping necessities. Scrut’s automation options—particularly for proof assortment and audit workflows—improves these processes considerably.

That stated, Scrut has some drawbacks, too. Whereas Scrut’s automation options are an enormous plus, I did discover that the preliminary setup will be time-consuming. This isn’t fully shocking—most GRC platforms talked about right here require some configuration—nevertheless it’s one thing to think about in the event you’re searching for a plug-and-play answer.

Moreover, the Scrut agent software program, which automates proof assortment, may use some enhancements, as some customers have famous that it doesn’t at all times carry out as anticipated.

Whatever the drawbacks, in the event you’re in cybersecurity, well being tech, fintech, or any trade the place compliance is a shifting goal, I might recommend you give Scrut a glance. It’s particularly helpful for mid-sized firms that want a scalable, audit-friendly platform to handle insurance policies, dangers, and safety frameworks in a single place.

What I like about Scrut Automation: 

  • Scrut takes the effort out of managing a number of frameworks like ISO 27001, HIPAA, and SOC 2. As a substitute of chasing down proof manually, I can depend on its automation options to deal with audits, observe insurance policies, and centralize documentation.
  • In contrast to some GRC instruments that depart you to determine issues out your self, Scrut supplies clear course all through the compliance course of. Whether or not it is coverage administration or danger monitoring, the platform ensures groups aren’t simply checking bins however truly bettering safety posture.

What G2 customers like about Scrut Automation: 

“Scrut Automation has considerably streamlined our compliance and safety processes. The platform’s user-friendly interface, complete dashboard, and intuitive automation options make managing frameworks like ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR easy.

 

I notably admire the automated proof assortment, which saves hours of guide work and reduces the danger of human error. The integrations with our current instruments (like AWS, Slack, and Jira) had been seamless, making certain all our knowledge sources are coated.”

 

Scrut Automation Evaluation, Karan A, Head of Area Operations. 

What I dislike about Scrut Automation:
  • From what I noticed, as soon as all the things is in place, Scrut runs easily, however getting there takes extra effort and time. So, be ready to spend time organising controls, mapping frameworks, and configuring workflows earlier than it actually begins paying off.
  • I’ve realized that whereas the Scrut agent is beneficial for scanning and monitoring safety posture in endpoint gadgets, it might be improved for higher efficiency. There are occasional sync points
What G2 customers dislike about Scrut Automation: 

“Whereas Scrut provides customizable controls, some organizations with extremely advanced necessities would possibly discover the pre-built template limiting. customization past a sure stage requires guide intervention or workarounds. Scrut automation could be very efficient, however the one factor is that it supplies many options, so for brand new customers, it’s overwhelming with out adequate coaching.” 

Scrut Automation Evaluation, Gautam M, DevOps Engineer.

4. IBM OpenPages

IBM is without doubt one of the most acknowledged names within the tech world, and, for my part, IBM OpenPages displays the corporate’s experience in creating options for advanced enterprise challenges.

IBM OpenPages

What units it aside for me is how scalable and adaptable it’s. OpenPages isn’t simply constructed for small groups—it scales to hundreds of customers, which makes it excellent for enterprises with each front-office and back-office customers managing dangers throughout totally different domains. 

I really like its modular nature, which permits me to deploy domain-targeted modules for regulatory compliance, IT dangers, or operational dangers.

One other notable spotlight for me is its AI-driven capabilities. From automating workflows with easy drag-and-drop performance to leveraging predictive analytics by means of IBM Cognos, it feels just like the platform is continually working to scale back the workload of my audit and compliance group. One use case that stood out to me was the mixing with AI for incident reporting. It’s not nearly flagging dangers—it makes use of related classifications to enhance the accuracy and effectivity of reporting,

The platform’s flexibility is one other huge win, for my part. Whether or not you wish to deploy it behind your firewall or on any cloud, it adapts to your infrastructure wants. I’ve seen instruments that pressure you to suit their deployment mannequin, however OpenPages provides you full freedom, which is a large plus for organizations with strict IT or knowledge governance insurance policies.

I even have to say how effectively it integrates with third-party programs. With IBM App Join and REST APIs, I can join OpenPages to different important instruments in my tech stack with none problem.

In fact, OpenPages is not excellent. I’d say the onboarding course of for such a strong device can really feel a bit overwhelming at first, particularly for groups with out prior expertise with comparable instruments. The intensive customization choices are nice, however they’ll require important time and assets throughout implementation. 

One other widespread concern I noticed amongst customers is the excessive price of IBM OpenPages. Some really feel that it’s costlier than competing GRC options, making adoption more difficult for groups with restricted budgets.

Nonetheless, in the event you’re in a compliance-heavy trade like banking, healthcare, or finance, IBM OpenPages is value contemplating.

What I like about IBM OpenPages:

  • What I actually get pleasure from about IBM OpenPages is how effortlessly it scales to deal with hundreds of customers throughout totally different domains, which makes managing dangers throughout advanced constructions really feel super-easy.
  • The modular strategy is one other standout for me. Having the ability to deploy particular modules for regulatory compliance, IT dangers, or operational dangers means I can tailor it precisely to what my group wants with out losing assets on pointless options.

What G2 customers like about IBM OpenPages: 

“It supplies us with the power to maintain all of the data of inside incidents within the group and monitor the important thing indicators of dangers.

 

It supplies us with essentially the most helpful options, that are the workflow engine, calculations, and safety guidelines, which information our actions and forestall loss and errors within the group. Its interface could be very intuitive and straightforward to make use of by clients.”

 

IBM OpenPages Evaluation, Quinta M, Product Supervisor.

What I dislike about IBM OpenPages:
  • Whereas the platform is extremely highly effective, the onboarding course of can really feel a bit daunting. Getting the customization proper usually takes extra effort and time than I’d like, particularly for groups new to one of these device.
  • One factor I’ve heard is that IBM OpenPages comes with a hefty price ticket, which could be a hurdle for groups working inside tight budgets.   
What G2 customers dislike about IBM OpenPages: 

“The price is excessive in comparison with different GRC instruments, and there are some hurdles in consumer adoption.”
IBM OpenPages Evaluation, Vishal D, Coach. 

Do you know if your corporation runs a lab, it is higher to ISO 17025 accredition? Study from our skilled on how one can adjust to the regulation.

5. Hyperproof

Hyperproof has shortly turn out to be one among my favourite GRC instruments, primarily due to its simplicity and the best way it handles a variety of danger and compliance processes.

Hyperproof

From what I’ve seen, essentially the most hanging attribute is its interface. Hyperproof retains issues easy with out sacrificing performance, a uncommon mixture in GRC instruments. Its clear design and intuitive navigation make it accessible even to customers who aren’t deeply acquainted with GRC processes. 

One other core power of Hyperproof, from my remark, is the 150+ pre-built templates of frameworks for various compliance rules, reminiscent of NIST, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOX. If I do not wish to use these templates, I can create a customized one appropriate for my wants. 

I completely love how Hyperproof automates proof gathering. It simplifies this usually tedious course of by permitting us to set controls primarily based on totally different InfoSec frameworks, assign house owners for these, then hyperlink proof on to controls and mechanically pull updates when wanted. It eliminates the necessity to chase down documentation manually, which is particularly helpful throughout high-pressure audits. Now, the most effective half? Hyperproof de-duplicates any overlapping controls between totally different frameworks. 

This stage of automation is not only a time-saver—it ensures consistency and reduces the danger of human error.

I like its vendor administration module, too. It not solely centralizes all vendor knowledge but in addition makes it straightforward to watch and handle dangers that might doubtlessly influence the group. As an example, throughout audits, pulling up related knowledge for distributors is so simple as a number of clicks, which reduces the time spent getting ready and ensures nothing is missed.

Nonetheless, a problem I  see with the device, at instances, is the terminology. If you happen to’ve used different GRC instruments, you’ll discover that Hyperproof’s terminology could be a little totally different, which creates a little bit of a studying curve. It’s not a dealbreaker, nevertheless it’s one thing that takes some getting used to.

Additionally, whereas Hyperproof covers the fundamentals effectively, there are specific functionalities that customers count on that aren’t there but. As an example, reporting customization is considerably restricted, whereas GRC customers would really like extra management over templates and knowledge visualization.

Whereas the device is straightforward to make use of,  I really feel the stage of effort to deploy Hyperproof into manufacturing and arrange integrations to automate some compliance features will be fairly intensive, relying in your compliance program. 

Even with these limitations, Hyperloop is greatest for firms seeking to automate the GRC workflows.

What I like about Hyperproof:

  • I really like how Hyperproof simplifies proof gathering with its automation capabilities. Linking proof on to controls and mechanically updating it saves me a lot time, particularly throughout audits, and reduces the probabilities of errors.
  • The pre-built templates for a number of compliance frameworks, reminiscent of ISO, PCI DSS, and NIST, are an enormous plus for me. They make dealing with overlapping necessities far simpler and guarantee we’re at all times audit-ready.

What G2 customers like about Hyperproof:  

It’s user-friendly and straightforward to navigate. The dashboard could be very useful for a fast look and checking your organization’s compliance standing. The options are good. Hyperproof is constantly bettering they usually do updates often. Workshops are good, particularly if they’ve new options coming in.

 

Hyperproof help is superior; you may get a swift response if in case you have a priority and supply a brief answer whereas checking in your concern. They may replace if there’s any improvement.

 

Our firm has been utilizing Hyperproof for nearly three years now, and it has actually modified the best way we handle our compliance. It makes my job a lot simpler. Hyperproof listens to its buyer’s suggestions, which I imagine is why It has improved its product so considerably. “

 

Hyperproof Evaluation, Apple A, Senior Compliance Analyst. 

What I dislike about Hyperproof:
  • From my remark, the reporting options depart a lot to be desired. Whereas Hyperproof supplies primary reporting capabilities, the customization choices are restricted.
  • Whereas the platform is straightforward to make use of, I really feel getting Hyperproof into manufacturing takes effort. The deployment course of required important time and assets, which might be a problem for smaller groups.
What G2 customers dislike about Hyperproof: 

The dashboard lacks customization choices, and the inner reporting characteristic falls wanting expectations, as it’s also non-customizable. Hyperproof’s recommended answer is to make use of Snowflake integration to extract knowledge and generate experiences. Moreover, a customizable, template-based questionnaire for assessments isn’t out there.” 

Hyperproof Evaluation, Satish S, Senior Cloud Compliance Lead. 

6. Fusion Framework System 

Fusion Framework System takes a structured, no-nonsense strategy to danger and resilience administration, and that’s precisely why it really works so effectively, for my part. In contrast to some GRC instruments that attempt to do all the things however find yourself feeling bloated, Fusion focuses on what issues: retaining dangers seen, automating important processes, and making certain groups can reply successfully when issues go unsuitable.

Fusion Framework Systems

One factor I instantly seen is how effectively the platform brings all the things below one roof. Whether or not it’s enterprise continuity planning, incident response, or third-party danger administration, Fusion consolidates all these shifting elements right into a single, related framework.

The place Fusion excels is in danger response automation—it doesn’t simply observe dangers; it connects danger assessments to enterprise continuity and incident response plans from what I noticed. This makes it notably helpful for organizations targeted on resilience somewhat than simply compliance.

I additionally discovered its customizable dashboards extremely helpful and handy. Having the ability to tailor them to point out precisely what I want makes an enormous distinction in how we observe dangers and compliance duties. Actual-time reporting is one other main plus. 

That stated, I’ve seen occasional slowness when dealing with massive datasets, or working advanced danger experiences or when a number of folks login concurrently. Whereas this isn’t a dealbreaker, it may be irritating when making an attempt to tug time-sensitive data for an audit.

Additionally, getting Fusion up and working takes time. Whereas I admire how versatile it’s, that flexibility comes with a tradeoff—you actually must configure it correctly to get essentially the most out of it. In case your group doesn’t have the assets to dedicate to setup and fine-tuning, the preliminary studying curve can really feel overwhelming. It’s highly effective, little doubt, nevertheless it calls for dedication.

So, it is clear to me that in the event you’re keen to speculate the time in setup, Fusion could be a extremely efficient danger and resilience administration too

What I like about Fusion Framework System: 

  • I really like how I can tailor my dashboard to show essentially the most related knowledge, whether or not it’s danger assessments, compliance duties, or incident experiences. It saves me from having to dig by means of a number of menus simply to get a transparent image of what’s occurring.
  • Having centralized danger knowledge means I don’t have to leap between totally different programs to get a transparent image of the state of affairs. I can shortly collect insights, observe rising dangers, and make knowledgeable choices with out digging by means of countless experiences.

What G2 customers like about Fusion Framework System:

“Threat administration is without doubt one of the most spectacular options of the Fusion Framework System, and I discover them distinctive. By integrating it with our programs, it provides us the power to research danger knowledge in a centralized style. Dashboards offering real-time knowledge with potential layouts are important for decision-making within the firm. Sure options reminiscent of managing incidents and monitoring regulatory compliance as effectively have made processes easier and improved our general danger administration technique.” 

 

–  Fusion Framework System Evaluation, Martin B, Director of Threat Administration. 

What I dislike about Fusion Framework System:
  • The system slows down at instances, particularly when a number of persons are utilizing it without delay. After I’m pulling experiences or making updates, these delays will be irritating and disrupt my workflow.
  • Whereas Fusion is a strong platform, I discovered that getting absolutely comfy with it takes time since its flexibility additionally means there’s rather a lot to configure upfront.
What G2 customers dislike about Fusion Framework System: 

“Getting began might appear to be a giant load as a result of there may be a lot one may do with it. Some extra clear steps or further assist on the very starting could be useful for certain. And generally, it turns into a bit gradual after we are working with bigger volumes of information. This turns into sort of irritating. It’s mandatory to hurry up this course of. This could be actually useful.” 

Fusion Framework System Evaluation, Harold P, Threat Administration Specialist. 

7. LogicGate Threat Cloud

Drawing from my expertise, LogicGate Threat Cloud is a wonderful addition to any group’s GRC toolkit if you would like a excessive diploma of customization. 

I discovered LogicGate to be extremely versatile and customizable, not like some GRC instruments that really feel inflexible. From constructing tailor-made workflows to configuring residence screens to show the data that issues most to us, the pliability of the platform is unmatched. What’s extra? If I’m not sure the place to begin, there are pre-built templates and functions that give s a stable basis to work from, making it simpler to stand up and working.

One other facet I deeply worth is the sheer vary of options out there with LogicGate. And I’m not simply speaking in regards to the standard suspects like cyber danger administration, ESG, audits, regulatory compliance, or third-party danger administration. What actually stood out to me was the devoted answer for AI governance. I don’t recall seeing this provided on different platforms.

Positive, I may in all probability customise different instruments to handle AI governance, however having a pre-built, devoted answer felt distinctive to LogicGate.

Additionally, I need to point out that their help group and implementation group is phenomenal. They’re at all times out there to reply questions, information you thru new options, or help with extra advanced configurations. Whether or not it’s a fast tip or strolling you thru a difficult course of, the group’s responsiveness and experience actually stand out. For a device as highly effective as Threat Cloud, having this stage of help makes an enormous distinction.

That stated, there are some areas the place LogicGate may enhance. One limitation I’ve come throughout is expounded to characteristic flexibility—whereas the platform provides customization, some customers really feel it doesn’t go as deep as they’d like. For instance, reporting capabilities may use extra visible enhancements, like higher colours and knowledge visualization choices. One other limitation I heard is expounded to the lack to create baby dangers or controls, which might be useful for extra granular danger monitoring. 

Moreover, the platform can really feel a bit of overwhelming at first, as per my evaluation.  Even after finishing the facility consumer coaching, it’d take a while to totally perceive the system’s capabilities, particularly in the event you’re new. However when you get the dangle of it, the system proves to be extremely helpful. It’s a device that grows with you as you discover ways to maximize its potential.

Total, LogicGate is a good selection in the event you’re searching for a extremely versatile GRC device able to addressing all kinds of compliance wants.

What I like about LogicGate Cloud Threat: 

  • I really like how customizable LogicGate is. From tailoring workflows to configuring dashboards to point out essentially the most related data, it feels just like the device molds itself to the consumer’s precise wants somewhat than the opposite means round. 
  • One other standout for me is the vary of options it provides. Past the standard options like cyber danger administration or audits, the inclusion of distinctive options like AI governance caught my consideration.

What G2 customers like about LogicGate Cloud Threat:  

I really like that LogicGate is extremely customizable to satisfy your group’s particular wants; nevertheless, there are additionally templates and functions to get you began in the event you aren’t certain how one can proceed.” 

LogicGate Cloud Threat Evaluation, Ashleigh G.

What I dislike about LogicGate Cloud Threat:
  • From my observations, the platform can really feel overwhelming at first, even after finishing the facility consumer coaching to totally grasp its capabilities and really feel comfy navigating it.
  • Whereas the system provides nice flexibility, I’ve seen some limitations in terms of customizations of reporters or monitoring granular relationships, like baby dangers or controls. Including deeper performance on this space would make it much more helpful.
What G2 customers dislike about LogicGate Cloud Threat: 

It may possibly appear a bit of daunting at first, even after finishing the facility consumer coaching, particularly in case you are somebody new to the corporate that’s already utilizing Threat Cloud.”

LogicGate Cloud Threat Evaluation, David D.

Earlier than wrapping up, I wished to spotlight a number of different GRC platforms which have stood out to me. Whereas the instruments I’ve reviewed are my high picks, there are a number of others value exploring primarily based on the G2 grid report, my very own expertise, and conversations I’ve had with professionals within the GRC area. Right here they’re: 

  • Diligent One Platform (previously HighBond) is right for organizations that want a complete answer for audit, danger, and compliance with sturdy reporting capabilities.
  • ServiceNow Built-in Threat Administration is greatest for enterprises that wish to easilu combine danger administration into IT workflows and operations.
  • OnSpring is nice for groups that worth flexibility and a no-code platform to customise their GRC processes with out counting on builders.
  • SAI360 is ideal for organizations that require sturdy ESG capabilities alongside conventional danger and compliance administration.
  • Vanta is greatest for startups and SMBs seeking to streamline SOC 2 compliance with automated proof assortment and monitoring.
  • Drata is the go-to selection for firms aiming to attain and preserve compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA shortly and effectively.

These platforms every provide one thing distinctive and relying in your group’s wants, they usually’re all value a better look.

Ceaselessly requested questions (FAQ) on GRC software program

1. Who makes use of governance, danger and compliance software program?

GRC software program is utilized by a variety of pros, together with compliance officers, danger managers, inside auditors, IT groups, authorized groups, and govt management. It’s notably helpful in industries with stringent regulatory necessities, reminiscent of banking, healthcare, manufacturing, and know-how.

2. Which industries want GRC software program?

GRC software program is important for industries that function below strict regulatory and compliance necessities. These embody:

  • Monetary providers: To adjust to rules like SOX, GDPR, and PCI DSS whereas managing operational and credit score dangers.
  • Healthcare: For HIPAA compliance, knowledge safety, and danger administration in affected person care and operations.
  • Know-how and SaaS: To make sure SOC 2, ISO 27001, and knowledge privateness compliance.
  • Manufacturing: For provide chain danger administration and compliance with trade requirements like ISO and OSHA.
  • Power and utilities: To satisfy environmental, well being, and security (EHS) rules and handle dangers in operations.
  • Retail and e-commerce: For PCI DSS compliance, knowledge safety, and third-party vendor danger administration.

3. What are the important thing options to search for in GRC compliance software program?

When selecting GRC software program, search for options like:

  • Threat administration and evaluation instruments.
  • Compliance monitoring and reporting.
  • Workflow automation for audits and proof assortment.
  • Integration with third-party instruments (e.g., ERP, CRM, SIEM).
  • Customizable dashboards and real-time analytics.
  • Assist for a number of compliance frameworks like ISO, SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR.

3. How a lot does GRC software program price?

The price of GRC software program varies relying on the seller, options, and scale of deployment and usually ranges from $15,000 to over $50,000.  Pricing fashions can embody subscription charges, per-user licensing, or usage-based prices. The GRC software program usually include coaching for customers and add-on options at further price.

4. Can GRC software program help a number of compliance requirements?

Sure, many GRC instruments are designed to deal with a number of frameworks, together with ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. These platforms permit companies to map controls throughout totally different requirements, lowering duplication of effort and streamlining compliance administration.

5. How does GRC software program assist companies keep compliant?

GRC instruments simplify compliance by automating guide duties like management monitoring, proof assortment, and reporting. Options like automated reminders and real-time monitoring guarantee deadlines are met and audits are simpler to handle. GRC platforms additionally preserve companies up to date on regulatory modifications and cut back the danger of human error.

6. What are the most effective GRC software program options in 2025?

A few of the high GRC software program s in 2025 embody:

  • AuditBoard: Finest for automating audits and SOX compliance.
  • Workiva: Supreme for monetary reporting and built-in compliance.
  • IBM OpenPages: Finest for scalable, AI-driven GRC options.
  • Hyperproof: Excels in proof automation and multi-framework compliance.
  • LogicGate Threat Cloud: Extremely customizable for distinctive danger administration workflows.

Different noteworthy platforms embody Diligent One Platform, ServiceNow Built-in Threat Administration, Vanta, and Drata.

Compliance conquered

As somebody who has explored the ins and outs of those GRC platforms, I’ve come to understand that the correct GRC device transcend simply “serving to” organizations keep compliant. They offer groups a option to work smarter, sooner, and with way more confidence.

From my very own group’s expertise, it’s clear that these platforms remedy ache factors which have historically plagued compliance and danger administration groups, whether or not it’s disorganized workflows, siloed knowledge, or the sheer complexity of audits.

However what actually stands out to me is how they shift the main target from reactive firefighting to proactive danger administration. They offer groups the arrogance to remain forward, not simply sustain. If you happen to’ve ever spent hours chasing proof or untangling audit prep, you’ll know precisely what I imply. So, why anticipate the subsequent audit to catch you off guard? 

Right here’s the next step: take cost. Take into consideration your group’s greatest challenges—whether or not it’s chasing proof, managing dangers, or untangling audits—and establish what’s holding you again. Then, search for a GRC platform that aligns together with your wants and empowers your group to work smarter and check out their demos. our group—and your future self—will thanks once you discover the correct device. 

Need assistance to maintain up with altering authorities rules? Discover the most effective regulatory change administration software program to sort out them head on. 

(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_GB/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v3.0”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *